Explain key differences between the ‘quantitative revolution’, Marxism and the ‘cultural turn’ and assess the way these approaches have influenced geographical research

rationalize key differences between the denary gyration, Marxism and the cultural bending and assess the way these approaches vex influenced geographical look for\n\n geographics as a soften had been dominated by regional geographics for much of the inaugural half of the twentieth century. Geographers picked go forth regions to study, and then analyzed the somatic and cultural processes that made those regions laughable. A region contains a special, alone(predicate), and in some ways equivalent combination of kinds or categories of phenomena (Schaefer 1953) and the singularity of e actually region was much(prenominal) that the only generalization that could be made about these regions was that they were unique (Peet 1998).\n\nBut Schaefer was unhappy with geography being classified in this way. He felt that in that location were regularities between the relative unique positions of phenomena, and thus spatial patterns and geomorphological laws existed (Bennet 1985). This led to the birth of the quantifiable gyration, where geographers foc utilize their studies in researching these patterns and laws, and sought to let off them utilize skill.\n\nJohn Marshall argues that geography had always been a science by virtue of the event it is a truth-seeking discipline whose rude materials consist of data-based observations (Marshall 1985). When the revolution began in the 1950s, examples already existed of empirical observations being usaged to beg off phenomena in human geography. Christaller used mathematical models in his telephone exchange place theory (1933) to explain the way people laid out the inhabited embellish because he had observed that besides sized settlements were equidistant from for each one other. An example of such a study from the time of the revolution would be MacArthur and Wilsons possibility of Island Biogeography (1969) which seeks to explain how islands and other habitat islands be colonized by flora and fauna . It is based on the observation that islands far from the mainland usually move over different and sometimes completely unique biogeographies, and the authors use some very tortuous mathematical equations to show how this phenomenon occurs.\n\n some(prenominal) people were however very critical of this approach to geography, in particular the positivist (scientific) side to it. The critics arguments are based on the position that the positivist approach was suppose to be value free, however as human geography is a social science, and the geographers doing the research are part of society, they have their own values which inevitably influence their studies (Cloke et al 1991). other criticism came from Gould (1970) who argued that, with the exception...If you want to construct a full essay, run it on our website:

Buy Essay NOW and get 15% DISCOUNT for first order. Only Best Essay Writers and excellent support 24/7!